Yes, I listened to the entire episode, and no, you have no way of disproving that. Excellent episode in my book, but I understand why it may be too much for most people. The discussion of the nondelegation doctrine was interesting, and now I have thoughts to share for my Substack. Need more of those, so thank you!
Im having trouble finishing this episode after Will's aside that David Shor's exit from his firm in 2020 was a "radicalizing" event. I haven't heard him use that description before and it's a very strange incident to be radicalized about. Unless lots of other things are radicalizing him and he just opts not to mention it.
Possible reason: Shor was a professional getting fired for his expert analysis being politically unpopular (with a certain sub set of the population). It is not hard to see why other professionals with potentially unpopular views might be concerned.
My nomination for a future episode before the season ends: McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson.
Yes, I listened to the entire episode, and no, you have no way of disproving that. Excellent episode in my book, but I understand why it may be too much for most people. The discussion of the nondelegation doctrine was interesting, and now I have thoughts to share for my Substack. Need more of those, so thank you!
Im having trouble finishing this episode after Will's aside that David Shor's exit from his firm in 2020 was a "radicalizing" event. I haven't heard him use that description before and it's a very strange incident to be radicalized about. Unless lots of other things are radicalizing him and he just opts not to mention it.
Possible reason: Shor was a professional getting fired for his expert analysis being politically unpopular (with a certain sub set of the population). It is not hard to see why other professionals with potentially unpopular views might be concerned.