Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Simpson's avatar

This analysis completely ignores why there have been so many injunctions this year, and the purpose of injunctions. I'd say it's baffling, if I hadn't begun to finally understand that people in law see all this stuff as a silly intellectual game rather than what they really are - matters of life and death.

Expand full comment
Bill Janson's avatar

Thanks for addressing this. I suspect your explanation will still be unsatisfying to some. The question is “why now,” and you essentially explain “because it didn’t happen before.” All 100% correct, but in a deeper sense not really answering the question.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts