Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gilbert Meng's avatar

Professor Baude,

I wonder whether a more classical understanding of common law could help us see the desirability of workarounds in public law. I recall reading a passage from Christopher St.German's (1460, 1540) exposition of equity which suggested that every rule, being of human and thus finite origin, must imply its exception. This statement, offered as commonsense, must seem staggering to the modern mind trained on statues and constitutions.

Of course, English law changed since St. German. Maybe political theory can offer some help here. Thinkers like Carl Schmidt have made their focus to criticize the kind of bureaucratic depersonalization that characterizes the modern state, which in their view unduly neutered the sphere of the political. Maybe the approach found in St.German only made sense because of the centrality of people to legal proceedings, as opposed to text. This might be wading too far into the realm of speculation.

Expand full comment
Louis Levesque's avatar

The Keener paper in particular looks great!

Expand full comment