Just wanted to chime in that I have always enjoyed the beginning of podcast banter! It's up to y'all how you want to run your railroad and I suspect there are a lot of listeners who appreciate the banter alongside the heavy-duty analysis
Will references the idea of a defendant having "a liberty interest in being moved from death row to prison." Would it not be more accurate --- and more elegant? --- to say a defendant has a "life interest" in that move? I believe there is considerable SCOTUS discourse about "life interest" in a capital clemency procedure case, Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard, 523 U.S. 272 (1998).
I recognize these are all attempts to be funny, but I am a positivist and to my knowledge none of the Star Ward galactic governments have adopted the Constitution, the posse commitatus act or other US law.
Shouldn't the title for the spinoff chit-chat podcast with material not relevant to the legal analysis be "Dicta"?
Just wanted to chime in that I have always enjoyed the beginning of podcast banter! It's up to y'all how you want to run your railroad and I suspect there are a lot of listeners who appreciate the banter alongside the heavy-duty analysis
The real relief was the friends we made along the way.
Will references the idea of a defendant having "a liberty interest in being moved from death row to prison." Would it not be more accurate --- and more elegant? --- to say a defendant has a "life interest" in that move? I believe there is considerable SCOTUS discourse about "life interest" in a capital clemency procedure case, Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard, 523 U.S. 272 (1998).
Yes! Listening to this episode afterwards I had the same thought and appreciate the amendment.
I recognize these are all attempts to be funny, but I am a positivist and to my knowledge none of the Star Ward galactic governments have adopted the Constitution, the posse commitatus act or other US law.
No - do you have a Hayekian take on Star Wars? That would be interesting.